WEBVTT
00:00:01.260 --> 00:00:04.460
In this video, we’re going to learn about moment of inertia.
00:00:04.790 --> 00:00:08.670
We’ll learn what it is, why it matters, and how to calculate it.
00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:13.480
To get started, imagine you’re holding a race called “The Shapes Race.”
00:00:13.880 --> 00:00:24.270
At the top of an inclined plane, you’ve placed a hollow ring, a solid ball, a long solid cylinder, and a hollow spherical shell.
00:00:24.720 --> 00:00:30.330
On cue, all four of these shapes are released at the same time and allowed to start rolling down the incline.
00:00:30.790 --> 00:00:34.750
Certain of these shapes roll downhill more readily than others.
00:00:34.750 --> 00:00:36.440
And they pull ahead in the race.
00:00:36.870 --> 00:00:44.270
If you wanted to predict ahead of time which of the shapes will win the race, it will be helpful to know something about moment of inertia.
00:00:44.750 --> 00:00:54.390
We can begin to understand the notion of moment of inertia by realizing that certain linear variables have rotational analogs, and vice versa.
00:00:54.870 --> 00:00:59.190
For example, consider the linear variable 𝑠, which stands for distance.
00:00:59.690 --> 00:01:06.710
In the rotational world, the variable that corresponds to 𝑠 we can call 𝜃, for an angular distance.
00:01:07.160 --> 00:01:10.010
These two variables correspond to one another.
00:01:10.200 --> 00:01:12.510
They both describe a distance traveled.
00:01:12.970 --> 00:01:17.460
It might be surprising to learn that mass is also a linear variable.
00:01:17.860 --> 00:01:19.150
Here’s what we mean by that.
00:01:19.500 --> 00:01:29.300
Whenever we draw the free body diagram of forces acting on a mass, we know that those forces move through the center of the mass, that is, its center of mass.
00:01:29.700 --> 00:01:34.740
Forces that act this way tend to translate rather than rotate our mass 𝑚.
00:01:35.080 --> 00:01:43.340
So the mass in response to forces such as these or any forces we might draw in using a free body diagram tends to move in a line.
00:01:43.790 --> 00:01:46.540
But we’re now going to imagine a different scenario.
00:01:46.860 --> 00:01:59.690
Instead of our forces always originating or passing through the center of mass of our object, we’ll now consider scenarios where the forces act along some different axis than the line through the center of mass.
00:02:00.020 --> 00:02:03.530
Forces such as these tend to make our mass rotate.
00:02:03.970 --> 00:02:10.210
And depending on the shape and distribution of our mass, that rotation will be more or less difficult.
00:02:10.720 --> 00:02:16.180
This is the notion behind moment of inertia, often symbolized with a capital 𝐼.
00:02:16.640 --> 00:02:26.000
Instead of our forces moving through the center of mass of an object, which will lead to its linear translation, our forces now act outside of that center.
00:02:26.520 --> 00:02:37.010
Or even if the forces do move through the mass’s center, we might be considering the motion of the mass relative to an axis of rotation some distance away from its center.
00:02:37.570 --> 00:02:41.650
We can see that moment of inertia always has to deal with rotation.
00:02:41.980 --> 00:02:46.520
And it’s in that sense that the moment of inertia is like a rotational mass.
00:02:47.010 --> 00:02:54.120
Say that we have a randomly shaped mass, subject to a force that moves through the center of mass of the object.
00:02:54.490 --> 00:03:00.810
And we’ll say that this force causes the mass to move in a circular path around an axis of rotation.
00:03:01.220 --> 00:03:12.970
Given that we have a force on a mass that is moving in a circular path, by Newton’s second law of motion, we can write a linear expression of this as 𝐹 equals 𝑚 times 𝑎.
00:03:13.460 --> 00:03:17.720
Interestingly, there’s a rotational version of Newton’s second law.
00:03:18.020 --> 00:03:23.280
And we can find that version by considering that our mass is at a distance 𝑟 from the center of rotation.
00:03:23.790 --> 00:03:37.850
And if the vector 𝐹 and the vector 𝑟 are perpendicular to one another, we can write that 𝐹 times 𝑟 is equal to the moment of inertia, rotational mass remember, multiplied by angular acceleration 𝛼.
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:45.310
So not only do individual variables have linear and rotational pairs, but so does Newton’s second law.
00:03:45.370 --> 00:03:47.510
There’s a linear and rotational version.
00:03:48.020 --> 00:03:56.810
It’s this rotational expression of Newton’s second law of motion that gives us a little bit of a better feel for just what moment of inertia 𝐼 is.
00:03:57.390 --> 00:04:05.150
As we consider this connection between mass and moment of inertia, the question may come up: measuring mass is straightforward enough.
00:04:05.350 --> 00:04:11.220
As long as we know the acceleration due to gravity, we can put a body on a scale and solve for its mass that way.
00:04:11.790 --> 00:04:13.080
But what about 𝐼?
00:04:13.110 --> 00:04:15.320
What about an object’s moment of inertia?
00:04:15.760 --> 00:04:21.040
It turns out that an object’s moment of inertia 𝐼 can be measured by using a simple pendulum.
00:04:21.620 --> 00:04:34.670
If we attach the shape whose moment of inertia we want to measure to the arm of a pendulum and let it swing freely under the influence of gravity, we can see that the back and forth motion the pendulum makes is a rotation.
00:04:35.130 --> 00:04:45.900
We can explore just how easy or difficult it is for the mass to make this rotation by varying the length of the pendulum’s arm as well as the amplitude from which it’s released.
00:04:46.360 --> 00:04:56.290
For more common shapes, an example of which is the hollow cylinder we have here, the moment of inertia of those shapes about particular axes has already been calculated.
00:04:56.520 --> 00:04:58.140
And we can look them up in a table.
00:04:58.730 --> 00:05:11.140
As examples of various shapes and their corresponding moments of inertia, the moment of inertia of a point mass is equal to the mass of that point multiplied by the square of its distance from the axis of rotation.
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:19.400
A solid sphere, on the other hand, rotating about its center, has a moment of inertia of two-fifths its mass times its radius squared.
00:05:20.080 --> 00:05:27.890
And a solid rod rotating about one end of the rod has a moment of inertia of one-third its mass times the length of the rod squared.
00:05:28.290 --> 00:05:31.120
This brings up an important point about moment of inertia.
00:05:31.450 --> 00:05:36.010
We’ve been talking about how moment of inertia 𝐼 and mass are similar to one another.
00:05:36.500 --> 00:05:46.630
An object’s moment of inertia 𝐼 depends not only on the object’s shape and density, like mass does, but 𝐼 also depends on the axis of rotation.
00:05:47.020 --> 00:05:59.490
For example, if we measure the moment of inertia of our hollow cylinder in this case, then that measured value would depend not just on the mass of our cylinder, but also on its position or its orientation.
00:05:59.960 --> 00:06:15.440
If we move the cylinder so that now, instead of its center, one of its ends is attached to the pendulum arm or if we rotated it so it was in line with the pendulum arm, in each of these three cases, we will probably measure a different moment of inertia, same shape different moment.
00:06:16.050 --> 00:06:27.310
So when we do go to a table to look up the moment of inertia of a particular shape, we’ll want to be careful to ensure that the axis of rotation of our shape matches our scenario.
00:06:27.630 --> 00:06:31.960
Otherwise, we’ll write down an incorrect or unmatching moment of inertia.
00:06:32.530 --> 00:06:37.820
In addition to looking up an object’s moment of inertia, it’s also possible to calculate it.
00:06:38.350 --> 00:06:51.040
To consider how we might do this, let’s consider again our moment of inertia of a point mass, that is, an infinitely small mass with mass value 𝑚 a distance 𝑟 away from an axis of rotation.
00:06:51.510 --> 00:06:57.390
Under these conditions, that point mass’s moment of inertia has been determined to be its mass times 𝑟 squared.
00:06:57.890 --> 00:07:03.530
Now let’s imagine that we envelop or surround our point mass with a much larger extended mass.
00:07:03.950 --> 00:07:09.710
The point mass 𝑚 is an infinitesimally small component of this larger mass.
00:07:10.080 --> 00:07:17.730
And we could even say that this larger mass is simply composed of infinitely many infinitesimally small point masses.
00:07:18.200 --> 00:07:39.730
If, for each infinitesimally small mass element that makes up this larger mass, we calculate that mass element times the square of its distance from the axis of rotation, then adding up all those parts through integration, we would solve for the overall moment of inertia of this extended mass with random shape.
00:07:40.270 --> 00:07:53.390
Typically, when calculating the integral to solve for an object’s moment of inertia, we express the differential mass element 𝑑𝑚 in terms of 𝑑𝑟 in some way, depending on the shape of the mass we want to solve for.
00:07:53.860 --> 00:08:03.370
Beyond calculating an object’s moment of inertia from scratch, there’s one more moment of inertia tool we’ll want to learn before getting some practice with these ideas.
00:08:03.750 --> 00:08:07.460
This tool is known as the parallel axis theorem.
00:08:07.870 --> 00:08:09.880
Here’s one way to think about this theorem.
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:15.560
Say that we have a solid sphere that’s rotating about an axis that runs through its center.
00:08:15.950 --> 00:08:23.910
We saw earlier that the moment of inertia of this shape rotating about its center of mass is two-fifths its mass times its radius squared.
00:08:24.310 --> 00:08:28.780
And we noted that this result depends on the position of the axis of rotation.
00:08:29.150 --> 00:08:33.930
If that axis were to move, then so would the overall moment of inertia of this mass.
00:08:34.400 --> 00:08:40.440
Let’s say, for instance, that we move our axis of rotation from the center of the sphere to some other point.
00:08:41.090 --> 00:08:45.690
And we’ll say that that point is separated from the center of the sphere by a distance 𝑑.
00:08:46.070 --> 00:08:50.070
Here’s what the parallel axis theorem tells us about this situation.
00:08:50.470 --> 00:08:59.380
This theorem says that if we move our rotation axis to another position but keep the axis parallel to its original orientation.
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:14.340
Then the new moment of inertia of a rotating object is equal to the sum of the moment of inertia of the object rotating about its center of mass plus its mass times the distance squared between the original and final axes of rotation.
00:09:14.790 --> 00:09:15.850
That’s a mouthful.
00:09:15.850 --> 00:09:25.870
But what it means is that we can take advantage of the moment of inertia of an object rotating about its center of mass when solving for its moment of inertia rotating about some other axis.
00:09:26.340 --> 00:09:31.480
This tool is very helpful in solving for moment of inertia when our rotation axis shifts.
00:09:31.870 --> 00:09:36.330
And it’s important to know that, to use it, our two axes must be parallel to one another.
00:09:36.790 --> 00:09:41.310
Knowing all this, let’s get some practice with moment of inertia through an example.
00:09:41.970 --> 00:09:44.950
A rod and a sphere are combined to form a system.
00:09:45.270 --> 00:09:48.390
The rod’s length 𝐿 is 0.50 meters.
00:09:48.550 --> 00:09:51.110
And its mass is 2.0 kilograms.
00:09:51.520 --> 00:09:54.950
The sphere’s radius 𝑅 is 20.0 centimeters.
00:09:54.950 --> 00:09:57.270
And its mass is 1.0 kilograms.
00:09:57.580 --> 00:10:07.570
The system can either rotate about the point 𝐴 at the opposite end of the rod to the sphere or about the point 𝐵 where the rod and the sphere connect, as shown in the diagram.
00:10:08.100 --> 00:10:11.650
Find the moment of inertia of the system about the point 𝐴.
00:10:12.000 --> 00:10:15.030
Find the moment of inertia of the system about the point 𝐵.
00:10:15.520 --> 00:10:19.350
We can call these two values 𝐼 sub 𝐴 and 𝐼 sub 𝐵.
00:10:19.830 --> 00:10:36.740
Considering the information we’ve been given that we’re told the length of the rod, its mass, the radius of the sphere, and its mass, we can begin solving for 𝐼 sub 𝐴 by writing out this moment of inertia as the sum of the components of this system of the rod and the sphere.
00:10:37.390 --> 00:10:46.100
𝐼 sub 𝐴 is equal to the moment of inertia of the rod rotating about point 𝐴 plus the moment of inertia of the sphere rotating about the same point.
00:10:46.580 --> 00:10:57.190
When we consider looking up the moments of inertia of the two parts of our system, we know we’ll be able to find the moment of inertia of a rod rotating about its end as we have in this case.
00:10:57.560 --> 00:11:03.880
But for the moment of inertia of a sphere, we’ll be able to find that value for a sphere rotating about its center.
00:11:04.190 --> 00:11:08.340
But in this case, the sphere does not rotate about its center, but about the point 𝐴.
00:11:08.810 --> 00:11:12.550
To help us out, we can recall the parallel axis theorem.
00:11:12.980 --> 00:11:33.410
This theorem says that if we have a mass 𝑚 with a rotation axis shifted a distance 𝑑 from the center of mass of 𝑚, then the overall moment of inertia of this object is equal to the moment of inertia of the object about its center of mass plus its mass times the distance 𝑑 squared between the two parallel axes.
00:11:33.760 --> 00:11:49.910
This means that when it comes to the moment of inertia of the sphere rotating about point 𝐴, that moment of inertia is equal to the moment of inertia of the sphere about its center of mass plus its mass times the distance from the axis of rotation, in our case 𝐿 plus 𝑅, squared.
00:11:50.450 --> 00:12:00.210
If we then go and look up in a table the moment of inertia of a rod rotating about one of its ends, we see that it’s one-third the mass of the rod times the length of the rod squared.
00:12:00.560 --> 00:12:09.640
Moreover, when we look up the moment of inertia of a sphere rotating about its center, we see that value is equal to two-fifths the sphere’s mass times its radius squared.
00:12:10.060 --> 00:12:32.150
All this means that we can rewrite the moment of inertia of our system rotating about the point 𝐴 as one-third the mass of the rod times its length squared plus two-fifths the mass of the sphere times its radius squared plus, because of the parallel axis theorem, the mass of the sphere multiplied by the length of the rod plus the radius of the sphere quantity squared.
00:12:32.540 --> 00:12:39.850
Since we’re given the values for all four of these variables in our problem statement, we’re ready to plug in and solve for 𝐼 sub 𝐴.
00:12:40.220 --> 00:12:49.610
When we plug in for all these values, we’re careful to convert the radius of our sphere from units of centimeters to units of meters to agree with the units in the rest of our expression.
00:12:49.980 --> 00:12:57.410
Adding these three terms together, we find a result, to two significant figures, of 0.67 kilograms meter squared.
00:12:57.730 --> 00:13:01.860
That’s the moment of inertia of this system rotating about point 𝐴.
00:13:02.320 --> 00:13:06.590
Next, we want to consider the same system, but a different rotation axis.
00:13:06.900 --> 00:13:11.070
Now our rotation axis is at the place where the rod and the sphere join.
00:13:11.500 --> 00:13:19.340
Once again, the moment of inertia of our system is equal to that of the rod plus that of the sphere for this particular rotation axis.
00:13:19.810 --> 00:13:28.030
Since the rod is, once again, rotating about one of its ends, we can again use the relationship for its moment of inertia about such an axis.
00:13:28.440 --> 00:13:38.620
Likewise, the sphere is not rotating about its center of mass, whose moment of inertia we know, but is rotating about an axis a distance of its radius 𝑅 away from that center.
00:13:39.160 --> 00:13:46.230
Our equation for 𝐼 sub 𝐵 is the same as our equation for 𝐼 sub 𝐴 was, except for one single term.
00:13:46.540 --> 00:13:52.460
Instead of our distance 𝑑 being 𝐿 plus 𝑅, now it’s simply 𝑅, the radius of our sphere.
00:13:52.930 --> 00:14:05.220
When we plug in for these values, again converting the radius of our sphere to units of meters, we find that 𝐼 sub 𝐵, to two significant figures, is 0.22 kilograms meter squared.
00:14:05.590 --> 00:14:10.090
That’s the moment of inertia of this system rotating about an axis through point 𝐵.
00:14:10.660 --> 00:14:13.740
Let’s summarize what we’ve learned about moment of inertia.
00:14:14.440 --> 00:14:19.770
We’ve seen that an object’s moment of inertia is equivalent to its rotational mass.
00:14:20.330 --> 00:14:28.790
Moment of inertia, symbolized by capital 𝐼, depends on an object’s mass, shape, and the axis that the object rotates around.
00:14:29.460 --> 00:14:32.750
Common moments of inertia can be looked up in a table.
00:14:33.040 --> 00:14:47.400
Or they can be calculated using the relationship the moment of inertia is equal to the integral of each infinitesimal mass element that makes up a larger mass multiplied by each element’s distance from the axis of rotation squared.