WEBVTT
00:00:01.800 --> 00:00:06.480
In this video, we’re talking about the kinetic energy of photoelectrons.
00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:10.760
This energy plays into an important physical effect.
00:00:11.480 --> 00:00:17.040
But before we talk about that, let’s consider what photoelectrons are in the first place.
00:00:18.400 --> 00:00:24.560
We know that electrons are the negatively charged objects in motion around atomic nuclei.
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:30.840
We could say that the electrons are bound to the nucleus by some amount of energy.
00:00:31.880 --> 00:00:43.000
And for certain types of atoms, in particular for metals, this amount of energy can be very small for some of the outer valence electrons.
00:00:44.120 --> 00:00:57.480
This means that, from an energy perspective, it’s not unlikely that these outermost electrons in a metal will receive some energy from their environment and leave the atom entirely.
00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:09.240
It’s these mobile electrons that are able to form an electric current when many metal atoms are brought together in a material.
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:20.720
But not only are electrons able to move within the material, but with the right amount of energy, they can be ejected from it.
00:01:20.720 --> 00:01:29.520
In the early 20th century, experiments were performed that involved shining light on the surfaces of metals.
00:01:30.440 --> 00:01:38.760
In some cases, under some conditions, it was noted that this incident radiation led to the ejection of electrons from the metal.
00:01:39.800 --> 00:01:44.080
These electrons ejected from the surface were called photoelectrons.
00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:55.240
This prefix photo- explains how it is that the electrons were energized to leave the surface, by absorbing the energy of incident light.
00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:01.080
Now, at this time, people thought of light primarily as a wave.
00:02:01.800 --> 00:02:17.520
Within this framework, the idea was, the way to add more energy to the surface of a metal, and thereby create more photoelectrons, was to increase the amplitude of the incoming wave.
00:02:18.400 --> 00:02:39.120
So, for example, if shining light like this on the surface wasn’t enough to create any photoelectrons, many scientists believed that the answer was to replace it with a wave like this, the same wavelength and frequency, but greater wave amplitude.
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:51.120
And if that didn’t create any photoelectrons from the surface, that simply meant the thinking went that the amplitude should be increased even more.
00:02:52.160 --> 00:02:59.920
The trouble was, this expectation of how to create photoelectrons wasn’t backed up by experimental evidence.
00:03:01.400 --> 00:03:19.040
Rather, researchers discovered that if the original wave didn’t lead to the creation of any photoelectrons, then neither would increasing that wave’s amplitude without changing its wavelength or its frequency.
00:03:20.360 --> 00:03:29.400
It turned out that rather than wave amplitude, it was the frequency of the incoming radiation that determined whether a photoelectron will be created or not.
00:03:30.400 --> 00:03:42.400
Once some minimum frequency value was achieved, then the incoming radiation would tend to lead to the creation of a photoelectron, regardless of the amplitude of that incoming light.
00:03:43.800 --> 00:03:55.720
This process of electrons within a material absorbing energy from incoming light and being ejected from the material can be called the photoelectric effect.
00:03:57.760 --> 00:04:10.120
In order to explain this effect, the German physicist Albert Einstein said that we should start to think of light not only as a wave, but also as a particle.
00:04:11.080 --> 00:04:14.480
These particles are known as photons.
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:23.680
And in order to explain the photoelectric effect, Einstein pointed to an equation generated by a colleague to describe the energy of photons.
00:04:24.640 --> 00:04:33.040
This equation says that the energy of a photon is equal to a constant value, called Planck’s constant, multiplied by the frequency of the photon.
00:04:34.400 --> 00:04:49.280
It was this energy, Einstein claimed, that was absorbed by electrons in a metal when light was incident on it that gave those electrons enough energy to escape the surface and become photoelectrons.
00:04:51.320 --> 00:04:57.960
We see from this equation that photon energy depends on only one variable, the frequency of the radiation.
00:04:59.160 --> 00:05:11.120
This explains why an orange-colored wave at a lower frequency than our blue wave was never able to eject an electron from the surface, no matter how big its amplitude got.
00:05:12.120 --> 00:05:18.840
The energy absorbed by the electrons in the metal doesn’t have to do with amplitude, but instead frequency.
00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:28.680
Knowing this, let’s say that we try shining light of various frequencies on this metal surface.
00:05:29.880 --> 00:05:38.160
We would observe that the lower frequency radiation isn’t able to create photoelectrons because it doesn’t have enough energy to do so.
00:05:39.400 --> 00:05:54.240
We would also notice though that once we pass a certain minimum frequency threshold, incoming light of that frequency and higher would create photoelectrons.
00:05:55.480 --> 00:06:02.560
But the photoelectrons these different incoming frequencies create are not the same.
00:06:03.440 --> 00:06:09.200
The higher the frequency of the incoming light, the more energetically the electrons would be ejected from the surface.
00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:12.280
And therefore, the more kinetic energy they would have.
00:06:13.920 --> 00:06:19.720
From an energy perspective, here’s how we can think about this process.
00:06:20.480 --> 00:06:29.040
When a photon is incident on the surface of a metal, it brings with it an energy, which is equal to its frequency multiplied by Planck’s constant.
00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:38.080
When that photon is absorbed by an electron in the material, this amount of energy is transferred to the electron.
00:06:39.320 --> 00:06:45.240
At that moment, we could say that this is the amount of energy possessed by the electron.
00:06:46.240 --> 00:06:52.600
But remember we said that electrons are energetically bound to the atom or the material they’re a part of.
00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:59.760
This is why mobile electrons on the surface of a metal tend not to leave that surface.
00:07:00.520 --> 00:07:06.880
The energy that binds an electron to the surface of a metal is known as the work function of that metal.
00:07:07.400 --> 00:07:10.000
And it’s abbreviated using a capital 𝑊.
00:07:11.600 --> 00:07:13.520
Work function is an amount of energy.
00:07:14.240 --> 00:07:18.520
It’s given in units of joules or in units of electron volts.
00:07:19.080 --> 00:07:21.200
And it varies from material to material.
00:07:21.920 --> 00:07:24.680
Different materials have different work functions.
00:07:25.480 --> 00:07:33.240
In other words, electrons have an easier or harder time escaping from their surfaces.
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:40.880
We could think of the work function as an energy barrier that keeps electrons from escaping.
00:07:41.560 --> 00:07:56.720
But as the photoelectric effect demonstrates, if an electron receives enough energy from an incoming photon, then even if the work function energy is subtracted from it, there will still be some left over.
00:07:58.880 --> 00:08:08.280
Now, at this point, we should note that the work function for a material is the minimum amount of energy needed for an electron to escape that surface.
00:08:08.960 --> 00:08:15.320
This means for an electron to move away from the surface into the vacuum surrounding it.
00:08:17.160 --> 00:08:29.240
Any of this ℎ times 𝑓 energy left over, so to speak, after the work function energy has been subtracted from it, is devoted to energy of motion of the electron, kinetic energy.
00:08:30.200 --> 00:08:46.680
So the energy of an incoming photon, which becomes the energy of an electron once that photon is absorbed by it, minus the work function energy of the particular material the electron is part of is equal to the maximum kinetic energy of a photoelectron.
00:08:47.880 --> 00:08:58.160
And we say that this is the maximum kinetic energy because again we’ve defined the work function to be the minimum amount of energy an electron needs to escape the surface.
00:08:59.480 --> 00:09:07.360
This equation helps us understand why some electrons leaving the metal have higher energy than others.
00:09:08.560 --> 00:09:14.720
All the escaping electrons face the same energy barrier, the work function.
00:09:15.560 --> 00:09:36.280
But depending on the frequency of the incoming photons they absorb, they can overcome this energy barrier by a little, leading to a slow moving photoelectron, or by a lot, leading to a photoelectron with lots of kinetic energy.
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:46.560
One way to represent this relationship between the frequency of an incoming photon and the energy of an ejected electron is by creating a graph.
00:09:48.800 --> 00:09:59.960
Say that we create a graph where, on the vertical axis, we plot the kinetic energy of ejected electrons, in energy units of electron volts.
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:03.920
And on the horizontal axis, we show the frequency of incoming radiation.
00:10:05.440 --> 00:10:14.560
Now, we know from experiment that until the frequency of the incoming radiation reaches a certain minimum value, no photoelectrons are created.
00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:22.400
Say that we start shining light at fairly low frequency on our metal surface.
00:10:23.560 --> 00:10:29.960
And as we increase that frequency, we see that still no photoelectrons are created.
00:10:31.160 --> 00:10:37.240
But then, at some critical frequency value, we start to see our curve turn up.
00:10:38.160 --> 00:10:45.240
This point where the graph bends shows us the minimum frequency needed to eject an electron.
00:10:46.360 --> 00:10:51.880
Then, as our frequency continues to go up and up, so does the kinetic energy of our photoelectrons.
00:10:53.920 --> 00:11:00.080
Now, let’s say that, for this particular material, the photoelectron kinetic energy looked like this.
00:11:01.360 --> 00:11:13.120
This means that, for an incoming photon with frequency four times 10 to the 14th hertz, we would have a corresponding kinetic energy of the photoelectron of one electron volt.
00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:27.680
And likewise, if we dialed up the frequency of the incoming photons to five times 10 to the 14th hertz, that would eject an electron with the kinetic energy of two electron volts.
00:11:28.600 --> 00:11:36.080
A graph like this shows us the minimum frequency needed to create a photoelectron from a given material.
00:11:37.920 --> 00:11:46.000
And by looking at that point, which is this point right here, we can solve for that material’s work function.
00:11:47.080 --> 00:11:51.720
We do this by considering the work function expressed in this relationship.
00:11:54.000 --> 00:12:03.520
Going back to our graph, at this bend in the graph, the point we’ve highlighted, this is where photoelectrons are just starting to be created.
00:12:05.160 --> 00:12:07.680
But their kinetic energy is zero.
00:12:08.200 --> 00:12:19.840
That is, the electron energy is just barely meeting the minimum value, the work function of the material, and escaping from the metal surface.
00:12:21.480 --> 00:12:29.600
These electrons, barely able to overcome the work function barrier, have no kinetic energy by the time they’re ejected.
00:12:30.720 --> 00:12:44.560
So at this particular frequency — and we’ll call this frequency 𝑓 sub zero — the energy of the incoming photon, and therefore the energy of the electron after it absorbs this photon, minus the work function is equal to zero.
00:12:46.440 --> 00:13:03.800
And then, if we add the work function to both sides of this equation, we see that at this particular frequency, what we could call the threshold frequency for this material, our work function is equal to that frequency times Planck’s constant.
00:13:05.360 --> 00:13:11.720
Now, this isn’t the only way to solve for the work function from a graph like we’ve seen.
00:13:12.800 --> 00:13:28.400
We could’ve also picked a point on the graph, say, this one right here, where our frequency is five times 10 to the 14th hertz and our ejected electron energy is two electron volts.
00:13:29.240 --> 00:13:32.960
And we could substitute those values into this original equation.
00:13:34.840 --> 00:13:53.640
We could say that Planck’s constant, which is known, multiplied by the frequency on our graph, five times 10 to the 14th hertz, minus the work function 𝑊 is equal to two electron volts, the kinetic energy of the ejected electrons.
00:13:55.400 --> 00:14:03.480
Then, if we subtract two electron volts from both sides of this equation and we add the work function to both sides.
00:14:04.520 --> 00:14:14.000
We now have an equation for the work function in terms of values we’ve read off the graph and a known constant.
00:14:16.320 --> 00:14:28.920
One other point we can make about this equation is, because we’re talking about photons, objects that move at the speed of light, and these photons have wave-like properties.
00:14:30.320 --> 00:14:50.080
We can recall that, in general, the frequency of a wave is equal to the wave speed divided by the wavelength, which means we can replace the frequency in our equation with 𝑐, the speed of these photons, divided by the wavelength 𝜆.
00:14:51.040 --> 00:14:54.160
This is an equivalent expression for the energy of a photoelectron.
00:14:55.400 --> 00:15:04.600
Thinking in terms of wavelength, rather than frequency like we did before, we’ll change the shape of a graph like this.
00:15:05.440 --> 00:15:18.600
If we have the kinetic energy of ejected photoelectrons on the vertical axis, like before, but now the wavelength of the incoming photons on the horizontal axis.
00:15:19.440 --> 00:15:22.280
The shape our graph will take will be something like this.
00:15:23.400 --> 00:15:34.280
Here, we see that as wavelength goes up, the kinetic energy of ejected electrons gets smaller and smaller until, above a certain wavelength value, that kinetic energy is zero.
00:15:35.640 --> 00:15:39.600
This means that no electrons are being ejected.
00:15:40.480 --> 00:15:45.760
The incoming photons aren’t high energy enough to do that.
00:15:47.520 --> 00:15:58.440
One thing to keep in mind in a graph like this is that as wavelength increases, the photon energy decreases.
00:15:59.320 --> 00:16:02.080
The two quantities are inversely related.
00:16:02.680 --> 00:16:10.160
This explains why as photon wavelength gets smaller and smaller, the kinetic energy of our ejected electrons gets greater.
00:16:11.320 --> 00:16:24.400
Given a graph like this, we could once again use points on it to solve for the work function of the material, this time using this equation.
00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:31.880
Knowing all this, let’s get a bit of practice now through an example exercise.
00:16:34.000 --> 00:16:44.400
A copper cathode in a vacuum chamber is illuminated with light from a laser, causing electrons to be emitted from the surface of the metal.
00:16:45.720 --> 00:16:51.360
The light has a frequency of 1.80 times 10 to the 15th hertz.
00:16:52.360 --> 00:16:58.560
The maximum kinetic energy of the ejected electrons is 2.80 electron volts.
00:16:59.560 --> 00:17:01.400
What is the work function of copper?
00:17:02.360 --> 00:17:10.760
Use a value of 4.14 times 10 to the negative 15th electron volt seconds for the value of the Planck constant.
00:17:12.520 --> 00:17:18.240
Give your answer in electron volts to three significant figures.
00:17:20.400 --> 00:17:24.880
Okay, so in this exercise, we have a copper cathode.
00:17:25.960 --> 00:17:27.560
And let’s say that this is that cathode.
00:17:28.320 --> 00:17:36.640
It’s in a vacuum chamber being illuminated, which causes some electrons to be ejected from the copper.
00:17:38.040 --> 00:17:59.680
We’re told that the frequency of the incoming radiation, we’ll call it 𝐹, is 1.80 times 10 to the 15th hertz and that the maximum kinetic energy of the electrons ejected from the copper, we’ll call it 𝐾𝐸 sub 𝑚, is 2.80 electron volts.
00:18:01.040 --> 00:18:11.360
Recall that one electron volt is equal to the amount of energy a charge of one electron gets when it’s moved across the potential difference of one volt.
00:18:13.040 --> 00:18:17.640
Knowing all this, we want to solve for the work function of copper.
00:18:19.160 --> 00:18:29.840
To figure this out, we can recall a relationship between frequency, 𝐹, maximum kinetic energy, 𝐾𝐸 sub 𝑚, and the work function of a material, called 𝑊.
00:18:30.880 --> 00:18:42.120
That relationship states that Planck’s constant ℎ multiplied by the frequency of incoming radiation minus the work function of a material is equal to the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons.
00:18:43.320 --> 00:18:55.800
Since we want to solve for the work function 𝑊, we’ll rearrange this equation by subtracting 𝐾𝐸 sub 𝑚 from both sides and adding the work function 𝑊 to both sides.
00:18:56.880 --> 00:19:03.080
When we do that, we find that 𝑊 is equal to ℎ times 𝑓 minus 𝐾𝐸 sub 𝑚.
00:19:04.880 --> 00:19:09.080
Note that a work function 𝑊 is specific to a particular material.
00:19:10.000 --> 00:19:14.680
In our case, we’re solving for the work function of our copper cathode.
00:19:15.280 --> 00:19:26.960
To help us solve for it, we’re given the frequency 𝑓 of incoming radiation as well as the maximum kinetic energy of ejected electrons.
00:19:28.640 --> 00:19:38.400
We’re also told to treat Planck’s constant ℎ as 4.14 times 10 to the negative 15th electron volt seconds.
00:19:39.320 --> 00:19:43.200
So let’s substitute those three values into this equation.
00:19:44.320 --> 00:19:48.160
With those values plugged in, let’s take a look for a second at the units involved.
00:19:49.680 --> 00:19:54.000
In our first term, we have electron volt seconds multiplied by hertz.
00:19:54.480 --> 00:20:01.480
But hertz, the number of cycles performed per second, can be replaced with one over seconds.
00:20:02.360 --> 00:20:09.320
And when we do this, we see that in multiplying these two values together, that factor of seconds will cancel out.
00:20:10.200 --> 00:20:18.640
So now, we have one number in electron volts being subtracted from another number in electron volts.
00:20:19.440 --> 00:20:22.920
Therefore, our final answer will be in these desired units.
00:20:23.720 --> 00:20:33.800
And when we calculate the value of this expression to three significant figures, we find a result of 4.65 electron volts.
00:20:34.440 --> 00:20:38.000
This is the work function of copper.
00:20:39.600 --> 00:20:44.080
Let’s summarize now what we’ve learned about the kinetic energy of photoelectrons.
00:20:45.160 --> 00:20:53.360
Starting off, we saw that photoelectrons are electrons ejected from a surface after absorbing incident light energy.
00:20:54.440 --> 00:21:02.400
We saw further that ejecting electrons from the surface of a metal by shining light on the metal is called the photoelectric effect.
00:21:03.240 --> 00:21:10.000
This effect can be best understood by thinking of light as a particle rather than as a wave.
00:21:11.360 --> 00:21:19.760
Furthermore, the work function of material, we learned, is the energy needed for an electron to escape the surface of that material.
00:21:21.160 --> 00:21:31.480
And lastly, the maximum kinetic energy of an electron ejected from a surface is equal to the energy of an incoming photon absorbed by the electron.
00:21:32.520 --> 00:21:38.800
This energy is ℎ times 𝑓 minus the work function 𝑊 of the material.
00:21:39.600 --> 00:21:49.240
And equivalently, this maximum kinetic energy is equal to ℎ times 𝑐 over 𝜆, the wavelength of the incoming photon, minus 𝑊.
00:21:50.200 --> 00:21:54.160
This is a summary of the kinetic energy of photoelectrons.