WEBVTT
00:00:01.680 --> 00:00:07.120
Estimate eight-ninths times six-sevenths by rounding to zero, a half, or one.
00:00:08.610 --> 00:00:12.850
Now we could do this calculation accurately by doing eight-ninths times six-sevenths.
00:00:13.550 --> 00:00:23.910
We might then spot that three is going to nine three times and three is going to six twice, so I’ve got eight times two over three times seven, which is sixteen over twenty-one.
00:00:25.100 --> 00:00:27.680
But that’s not what this question is asking us to do.
00:00:27.980 --> 00:00:35.760
It’s asking us to estimate eight-ninths times six-sevenths, and it’s giving us a specific method of calculating that estimate.
00:00:37.140 --> 00:00:40.540
So this unfortunately isn’t gonna get us any marks in this question.
00:00:41.770 --> 00:00:49.410
What we’ve got to do is take each component of the calculation and do some rounding on it before we actually carry out the calculation.
00:00:50.660 --> 00:00:55.450
So for example, eight-ninths, is it closer to zero or a half or one?
00:00:56.170 --> 00:01:00.630
And six-sevenths, is it closer to zero or a half or one?
00:01:02.580 --> 00:01:04.370
Let’s think about eight-ninths first.
00:01:04.560 --> 00:01:08.380
So I’ve drawn a little number line here and I’ve got zero, a half, and one.
00:01:08.620 --> 00:01:11.260
Now I’m gonna express those as ninths.
00:01:11.440 --> 00:01:21.670
So zero is zero-ninths, and one is nine-ninths, and a half of nine is four and a half, so a half is four and a half ninths.
00:01:22.740 --> 00:01:27.330
Now you shouldn’t normally write fractions within fractions, but we’re gonna let that go just for now.
00:01:28.800 --> 00:01:34.060
Now eight-ninths is nearly one; it’s clearly bigger than a half; it’s clearly not very close to zero.
00:01:35.110 --> 00:01:42.720
And I strongly suspect it’s closer to nine-ninths than it is to four and a half ninths; it’s closer to one than it is to a half, but let’s just check that.
00:01:43.810 --> 00:01:55.340
The distance from eight-ninths to nine-ninths is one-ninth, and the distance from eight-ninths back to four and a half ninths is minus three and a half ninths.
00:01:55.630 --> 00:02:01.280
So yes it seems that it’s closer to nine-ninths or closer to one than it is to a half.
00:02:01.280 --> 00:02:06.320
So instead of doing the calculation involving eight-ninths, I’m gonna round eight-ninths to one.
00:02:07.470 --> 00:02:12.980
So eight-ninths is approximately equal to one; that’s what that sign there means, approximately equal to.
00:02:14.230 --> 00:02:17.910
Now let’s do the same kind of logic for six-sevenths; we’ve got to round that.
00:02:17.910 --> 00:02:26.910
Six-sevenths is nearly one; it’s nowhere near zero; it’s somewhere between a half because a half will be three and a half sevenths and one which is seven-sevenths.
00:02:27.950 --> 00:02:34.270
So being between a half and one, what I’ve gotta work out is, is it closer to a half or is it closer to one?
00:02:35.460 --> 00:02:46.100
Well the distance from six-sevenths to seven-sevenths is plus one-seventh, and the distance from six-sevenths back to three and a half sevenths is minus two and a half sevenths.
00:02:46.350 --> 00:02:50.100
So it looks like it’s closer to one than it is to a half.
00:02:50.130 --> 00:02:53.890
It’s only one-seventh away from one, whereas it’s two and a half sevenths away from a half.
00:02:55.200 --> 00:03:06.860
So we’re gonna use the approximation of one for six-sevenths, so this calculation, eight-ninths times six-sevenths, is approximately equal to one times one and one times one is one.
00:03:08.060 --> 00:03:12.810
So we rounded eight-ninths to one and we rounded six-sevenths to one.
00:03:13.050 --> 00:03:18.570
And then when we completed the calculation, we found that eight-ninths times six-sevenths is roughly equal to one.