WEBVTT
00:00:02.640 --> 00:00:05.860
Light strikes the boundary between air and glass at an angle.
00:00:06.220 --> 00:00:08.840
Some of the light is reflected and some of it is refracted.
00:00:09.060 --> 00:00:15.250
Which of the following properties of the light is the same for both the incident ray and the refracted ray?
00:00:15.760 --> 00:00:24.220
(a) Power transmitted, (b) direction, (c) frequency, (d) speed, (e) wavelength.
00:00:24.630 --> 00:00:27.260
Letβs draw a picture of the situation described in the question.
00:00:27.870 --> 00:00:28.950
Hereβs the boundary.
00:00:29.390 --> 00:00:31.850
And there is air on one side and glass on the other.
00:00:32.210 --> 00:00:37.040
A ray of light is incident on the boundary, and it is incident at an angle.
00:00:37.290 --> 00:00:43.180
In the diagram, weβve labeled this angle with the symbol π π measured from a line perpendicular to the boundary.
00:00:43.840 --> 00:00:48.250
Some of this light is then reflected, that is, bounces back into the air.
00:00:48.780 --> 00:00:55.340
And some of the light is refracted, that is, transmitted into the glass possibly with a change of direction.
00:00:55.800 --> 00:01:02.640
The question wants to know which of the properties given is the same for both the incident ray and the refracted ray.
00:01:03.080 --> 00:01:04.830
So letβs take a look at these properties.
00:01:05.060 --> 00:01:07.010
Choice (a) is power transmitted.
00:01:07.610 --> 00:01:14.320
Because beams of light carry energy, they also transfer power, which is just a transfer of energy with respect to time.
00:01:14.740 --> 00:01:23.280
Therefore, since weβre interested in power before the light hits the boundary and after the light hits the boundary and power is directly related to energy.
00:01:23.410 --> 00:01:30.670
It makes sense to apply the conservation of energy, which states that the total initial energy is equal to the total final energy.
00:01:31.270 --> 00:01:39.240
Letβs call the power transmitted by the incident ray π zero, by the reflected ray π one, and by the refracted ray π two.
00:01:40.050 --> 00:01:54.070
Because thereβs no absorption at the boundary and energy is conserved, the energy carried per unit time to the boundary by the incident ray must exactly equal the total energy carried away from the boundary per unit time by the reflected and refracted rays.
00:01:54.350 --> 00:02:10.320
Since carrying energy to or away from the boundary is the same as transmitting power, we can write for our conservation of energy that π zero, the power transmitted by the incident ray, is equal to π one plus π two, the total power transmitted by the reflected and refracted rays.
00:02:10.690 --> 00:02:20.700
If we subtract π one from both sides, we get that π two, the power of the refracted ray, is equal to π zero minus π one, the power of the incident ray minus the power of the reflected ray.
00:02:21.330 --> 00:02:22.930
Now we make a key observation.
00:02:23.190 --> 00:02:30.510
From the question itself, we know that the reflected ray must exist, which means that it must have energy and must be transmitting power.
00:02:30.730 --> 00:02:32.620
So π one is greater than zero.
00:02:33.240 --> 00:02:41.620
However, if π one is greater than zero, it follows that π zero is not equal to π zero minus π one because π one is greater than zero.
00:02:41.750 --> 00:02:45.250
So π zero minus π one must be less than π zero.
00:02:45.890 --> 00:02:52.980
Note that we have a different expression for π zero minus π one; namely, π zero minus π one is equal to π two.
00:02:53.220 --> 00:02:57.960
So letβs substitute this in to π zero is not equal to π zero minus π one.
00:02:58.380 --> 00:03:01.800
Doing the substitution, we find π zero is not equal to π two.
00:03:02.000 --> 00:03:04.580
And this is exactly the sort of relationship weβre looking for.
00:03:04.750 --> 00:03:10.090
The power transmitted by the incident ray is not the same as the power transmitted by the refracted ray.
00:03:10.340 --> 00:03:12.150
And (a) is not the right answer.
00:03:12.630 --> 00:03:14.840
Letβs move on to choice (b) direction.
00:03:15.220 --> 00:03:21.850
The direction of the incident and refracted rays can be specified by their angle relative to the line perpendicular to the boundary.
00:03:22.260 --> 00:03:26.370
We already had π π for the incident ray on our diagram from before.
00:03:26.680 --> 00:03:32.160
And now weβve added π π for the angle between the refracted ray and the line perpendicular to the boundary.
00:03:32.750 --> 00:03:37.440
To relate these two angles and find out if theyβre the same or not, weβll use Snellβs law.
00:03:37.740 --> 00:03:44.330
Snellβs law relates the angle of an incident ray to the angle of a refracted ray through a quantity known as the index of refraction.
00:03:44.940 --> 00:03:50.950
The index of refraction is a number that relates the speed of light in a particular medium to the speed of light in vacuum.
00:03:51.730 --> 00:03:55.190
π π, the index of refraction of air, is approximately one.
00:03:55.450 --> 00:03:59.870
And π π, the index of refraction of glass, is approximately 1.3.
00:04:00.450 --> 00:04:02.950
The exact numerical values are not terribly important.
00:04:03.140 --> 00:04:08.640
But what is important is that the index of refraction of air is different from the index of refraction of glass.
00:04:09.060 --> 00:04:19.300
Letting the subscript one denote that weβre talking about the incident ray and the subscript two denote that weβre talking about the refracted ray, letβs plug in the variables from our diagram into Snellβs law.
00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:31.850
We get π π sin π π, the index of refraction in air times the sin of the angle of the incident ray, is equal to π π sin π π, the index of refraction in glass times the sin of the angle of the refracted ray.
00:04:32.440 --> 00:04:35.650
Letβs now use the fact that π π is not equal to π π.
00:04:35.890 --> 00:04:43.940
If π π is not equal to π π, it follows that sin π π cannot be equal to sin π π because, otherwise, Snellβs law would lead to a contradiction.
00:04:44.700 --> 00:04:50.880
But if sin π π is not equal to sin π π, then certainly π π is not equal to π π.
00:04:51.460 --> 00:04:58.570
But if π π is not equal to π π, the incident and refracted rays have different directions, and (b) is not the right answer.
00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:13.000
We can use the fact that the index of refraction of air is not equal to the index of refraction of glass to eliminate another one of the answer choices by recalling how exactly the index of refraction relates the speed of light in a material to the speed of light in vacuum.
00:05:13.530 --> 00:05:24.120
The index of refraction can be defined as the speed of light in vacuum, which weβve represented with the symbol π without any subscripts, divided by the speed of light in the particular material of interest.
00:05:24.730 --> 00:05:36.730
Thus, for example, the index of refraction of air is about one because the speed of light in air is about the same as the speed of light in vacuum, whereas the speed of light in glass is about 75 percent of that in vacuum.
00:05:36.910 --> 00:05:39.710
So the index of refraction of glass is about 1.3.
00:05:40.360 --> 00:05:44.270
Letβs now plug this into our inequality π π is not equal to π π.
00:05:44.660 --> 00:05:56.490
Letting π π be the speed of light in air and π π be the speed of light in glass, we have that speed of light in vacuum divided by speed of light in air is not equal to speed of light in vacuum divided by speed of light in glass.
00:05:57.000 --> 00:06:00.820
Both the left- and right-hand sides have a factor of speed of light in vacuum.
00:06:00.980 --> 00:06:03.520
So letβs multiply both sides by one over π.
00:06:04.250 --> 00:06:07.130
On both sides, π divided by π is one.
00:06:07.400 --> 00:06:13.890
And so weβre left with one divided by the speed of light in air is not equal to one divided by the speed of light in glass.
00:06:14.060 --> 00:06:19.330
But if the reciprocal of two quantities are not equal, then the quantities themselves are also not equal.
00:06:19.880 --> 00:06:24.190
We therefore find that the speed of light in air is not equal to the speed of light in glass.
00:06:24.320 --> 00:06:27.400
And so the incident and refracted rays have different speeds.
00:06:27.590 --> 00:06:29.570
And choice (d) is not correct.
00:06:30.050 --> 00:06:33.900
Weβre left with choices (c) frequency and (e) wavelength.
00:06:34.270 --> 00:06:42.870
Letβs take a closer look at the boundary where the incident and refracted rays meet and see if we can come up with the condition for the frequency to be either the same or different.
00:06:43.450 --> 00:06:51.210
Here, we have redrawn the boundary, the incident ray and the refracted ray, ignoring the reflected ray and the other details from our previous drawing.
00:06:51.870 --> 00:06:54.030
Light is an electromagnetic wave.
00:06:54.250 --> 00:07:00.710
So weβve drawn these two rays as squiggles instead of straight lines to emphasize that the electric field of each ray is oscillating.
00:07:01.340 --> 00:07:03.980
The squiggles represent the amplitude of the electric field.
00:07:04.200 --> 00:07:15.490
And in our picture, an oscillation would look like the squiggles that are towards the bottom left moving towards the top right or the squiggles that are towards the top right move towards the bottom left.
00:07:16.170 --> 00:07:20.540
Letβs now examine what happens to these oscillations at the boundary where the two rays meet.
00:07:21.020 --> 00:07:26.360
The other fact that weβll need to know to analyze this situation is that the electric field is continuous across a boundary.
00:07:26.590 --> 00:07:29.510
That is, itβs the same on both sides of the boundary.
00:07:30.230 --> 00:07:35.040
Since the electric field is continuous, the incident and refracted rays must oscillate in tandem.
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:40.970
So when the incident ray is oscillating towards the top right, the refracted ray must as well.
00:07:41.720 --> 00:07:44.950
And the same is true if the oscillation is towards the bottom left.
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:55.370
However, because of the continuity of the electric field, for all times, the incident and refracted rays need to oscillate in the same direction as each other, which means they must oscillate at the same rate.
00:07:55.950 --> 00:08:08.540
If the two fields oscillated at different rates, at some time, we would find the electric field of the incident ray at the boundary oscillating towards the upper right, while the electric field of the refracted ray at the boundary oscillated towards lower left.
00:08:08.850 --> 00:08:12.660
But this would literally result in the electric field being pulled apart at the boundary.
00:08:13.240 --> 00:08:15.360
The rate of oscillation is just a frequency.
00:08:15.730 --> 00:08:19.340
So we see that both rays must have the same frequency at the boundary.
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:26.440
This, in turn, means that both rays must have the same frequency everywhere because the frequency is constant within a medium.
00:08:26.670 --> 00:08:31.200
So the frequency of the incident ray is the same as the frequency of the incident ray at the boundary.
00:08:31.370 --> 00:08:36.230
And the frequency of the refracted ray is the same as the frequency of the refracted ray at the boundary.
00:08:36.490 --> 00:08:39.230
But those two frequencies at the boundary are equal.
00:08:39.670 --> 00:08:46.440
So because the electric field is continuous at the boundary, we find that the correct answer is choice (c) the frequency.
00:08:46.850 --> 00:08:50.440
As a final note, letβs confirm that wavelength would indeed be different.
00:08:50.580 --> 00:08:57.680
Weβll do this using the equation speed of light is equal to frequency times wavelength, where wavelength is represented with the symbol π.
00:08:58.420 --> 00:09:05.170
Letβs substitute this equation into our inequality speed of light in air is not equal to speed of light in glass.
00:09:05.420 --> 00:09:16.730
If the two speeds are different, it then follows that the frequency in air times the wavelength in air, that is, the speed in air, is not equal to the frequency in glass times the wavelength in glass, which is the speed in glass.
00:09:17.300 --> 00:09:21.670
However, as weβve already seen, the frequency on both sides of the boundary is the same.
00:09:21.810 --> 00:09:23.550
So π π equals π π.
00:09:23.990 --> 00:09:31.050
This being the case, the only way the inequality could possibly hold is if π π is not equal to π π.
00:09:31.690 --> 00:09:43.940
Thus, although we havenβt shown on independent physical grounds that the wavelength must be different, we have shown that the frequency is being the same is consistent with the wavelength being different, confirming that (c) is the right answer.