WEBVTT
00:00:02.210 --> 00:00:11.440
Matthew has four pieces of wood with length 160 centimeters, 0.8 meters, 40 centimeters, and 2.4 meters.
00:00:11.830 --> 00:00:17.200
He wants to cut all the lengths of wood into equal-sized pieces without having any left over.
00:00:17.770 --> 00:00:22.480
By finding the GCF, determine the greatest possible length of each piece.
00:00:24.360 --> 00:00:27.090
GCF stands for greatest common factor.
00:00:27.610 --> 00:00:36.810
The greatest common factor will give the greatest possible length of each piece that Matthew should use as this number will be the biggest number that divides into all four lengths.
00:00:38.260 --> 00:00:43.060
This will mean that the complete length of each piece of wood is used so there won’t be any wastage.
00:00:44.400 --> 00:00:47.350
The full length has been expressed using a mix of units.
00:00:47.490 --> 00:00:51.400
Two of them were expressed in centimeters and two were expressed in meters.
00:00:51.620 --> 00:00:54.060
We first need to convert to a common unit.
00:00:55.680 --> 00:01:03.300
To do so, we need to recall the conversion between meters and centimeters, which is that one meter is equivalent to 100 centimeters.
00:01:03.820 --> 00:01:08.130
I’m going to convert the two lengths that have been expressed in meters into centimeters.
00:01:09.760 --> 00:01:16.150
0.8 meters first of all is equal to 0.8 multiplied by 100 centimeters.
00:01:16.330 --> 00:01:18.800
It’s equivalent to 80 centimeters.
00:01:20.410 --> 00:01:23.520
2.4 meters can be converted in exactly the same way.
00:01:23.690 --> 00:01:28.010
I multiply it by 100, giving 240 centimeters.
00:01:29.480 --> 00:01:33.680
Next, I need to consider how to find the greatest common factor of these four numbers.
00:01:33.810 --> 00:01:36.300
And to do so, I’m going to use factor trees.
00:01:37.790 --> 00:01:39.590
Let’s start with the number 40.
00:01:40.030 --> 00:01:42.990
I need to consider how I can break this down into a product.
00:01:43.090 --> 00:01:45.570
And I’ll begin with the product of four and 10.
00:01:47.180 --> 00:01:49.630
This gives me my first branch of the factor tree.
00:01:49.820 --> 00:01:52.410
40 can be written as four multiplied by 10.
00:01:53.090 --> 00:01:54.670
Neither of these are prime numbers.
00:01:54.750 --> 00:01:56.730
So I need to continue with the factor tree.
00:01:58.370 --> 00:02:04.200
Four can be written as the product of two and two and 10 can be written as the product of five and two.
00:02:05.940 --> 00:02:10.740
Two and five are both prime numbers, which means the factor tree can’t continue any further.
00:02:11.050 --> 00:02:13.580
I found all the prime factors of 40.
00:02:15.080 --> 00:02:17.980
Next, I need to repeat this for the other three lengths.
00:02:19.530 --> 00:02:24.140
160 first of all can be written as the product of 16 and 10.
00:02:24.600 --> 00:02:26.080
Neither of these are prime numbers.
00:02:26.180 --> 00:02:27.960
So I need to continue the factor tree.
00:02:29.520 --> 00:02:35.040
16 can be written as the product of eight and two and 10 can be written as the product of five and two.
00:02:36.730 --> 00:02:38.490
Two and five are prime numbers.
00:02:38.600 --> 00:02:41.100
So these branches of the factor tree stop here.
00:02:41.430 --> 00:02:42.660
However, eight isn’t.
00:02:42.660 --> 00:02:44.560
So I need to continue this branch.
00:02:45.940 --> 00:02:50.180
Eight can be written as the product of four and two, with two being a prime number.
00:02:51.880 --> 00:02:56.240
Four, however, needs to be broken down further into the product of two and two.
00:02:56.770 --> 00:03:00.180
I’ve now found all the prime factors of 160.
00:03:02.030 --> 00:03:09.790
You can now pause the video and draw factor trees for the remaining two lengths: 80 centimeters and 240 centimeters.
00:03:11.830 --> 00:03:14.990
Here are my factor trees for 240 and 80.
00:03:15.480 --> 00:03:17.940
Yours might look slightly different and that’s okay.
00:03:18.180 --> 00:03:24.530
For example, you might have decided to break 240 down to the product of four and 60 first of all.
00:03:25.840 --> 00:03:29.100
This will mean that the branches of your factor tree looks slightly different.
00:03:29.330 --> 00:03:34.680
But the prime numbers that you reach at the end of the branches should be the same or a bit in a different order.
00:03:36.670 --> 00:03:43.740
Now that we have the four factor trees, we need to remember how to use these factor trees to find the greatest common factor of the four numbers.
00:03:45.630 --> 00:03:51.360
The greatest common factor will be equal to the product of all of the factors that the four numbers have in common.
00:03:51.760 --> 00:03:54.180
So we need to identify common factors.
00:03:55.700 --> 00:03:59.300
All four factor trees have a common factor of two first of all.
00:04:01.100 --> 00:04:03.490
They also share a second factor of two.
00:04:05.290 --> 00:04:08.290
In fact, they also share a third factor of two.
00:04:10.170 --> 00:04:15.870
160, 240, and 80 also share a fourth factor of two.
00:04:16.090 --> 00:04:20.610
But as this isn’t shared with 40, it isn’t a common factor of all four numbers.
00:04:22.390 --> 00:04:28.220
Looking at the factor trees again, we can see that there is also a common factor of five shared between all four numbers.
00:04:28.690 --> 00:04:30.410
Are there any other common factors?
00:04:31.770 --> 00:04:35.540
Well, they can’t be because we’ve actually used all of the factors of 40.
00:04:37.050 --> 00:04:42.780
The greatest common factor of the four numbers then is therefore found by multiplying the four common factors together.
00:04:43.090 --> 00:04:46.560
Two multiplied by two multiplied by two multiplied by five.
00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:50.840
The product of these four numbers is 40.
00:04:52.320 --> 00:05:01.010
You may have been able to spot that already as 40, 80, 160, and 240 are all fairly familiar multiples of 40.
00:05:02.510 --> 00:05:08.320
The greatest possible length of each piece that Matthew should use when cutting this wood is 40 centimeters.