WEBVTT
00:00:00.800 --> 00:00:07.680
Pressure is produced by fluids due to collisions between the particles in the fluid and objects that the fluid is in contact with.
00:00:08.010 --> 00:00:12.550
The smaller the average distance between particles is, the more frequently they collide.
00:00:12.990 --> 00:00:18.900
How does the average distance between particles in air compared to the average distance between particles in water?
00:00:19.470 --> 00:00:23.280
To consider this difference, let’s start out with a bit of a thought experiment.
00:00:23.710 --> 00:00:30.950
Imagine that we have a very tall cup which is currently empty; that is, it’s filled with air just like the cup is surrounded by air.
00:00:31.450 --> 00:00:33.980
Then, say that we fill the cup up with water.
00:00:34.370 --> 00:00:40.750
At this point, the walls of this cup have one kind of fluid on one side and another type on the other.
00:00:41.270 --> 00:00:51.220
If we look at a zoomed-in view of the wall of the cup, we would see something like this, where the wall of the cup separates the water on one side and the air on the other side.
00:00:51.530 --> 00:00:55.590
We want to compare the average distance between particles in these two fluids.
00:00:55.810 --> 00:01:01.330
And the problem statement tells us that this average distance is related to the pressure exerted by the fluid.
00:01:01.950 --> 00:01:06.900
If we consider the wall of this cup, we know that it’s under pressure from these two fluids.
00:01:07.190 --> 00:01:11.070
The water pushes outward on this wall and the air pushes inward.
00:01:11.560 --> 00:01:19.290
If we could figure out which of these pressures is greater, that would tell us about the relative average distance between particles in these two fluids.
00:01:19.650 --> 00:01:24.340
So which fluid water or air exerts a greater pressure on the wall of the cup?
00:01:24.850 --> 00:01:30.680
One way to find this out is to continue our thought experiment by imagining that the cup suddenly disappears.
00:01:31.020 --> 00:01:36.670
If the cup were all of a sudden to vanish, there would no longer be a boundary between these two fluids.
00:01:37.090 --> 00:01:47.860
We can imagine that with the cup gone that this whole column of water would start to descend under the influence of gravity, but the bottom of this column would also start to push out backward against the air.
00:01:48.270 --> 00:01:58.630
At this air-water interface then, we would see evidence of the water pushing on the air harder than the air is pushing on the water; that is, the water pressure is greater than the air pressure.
00:01:58.820 --> 00:02:03.350
And that tells us something about the relative average distance between particles in these fluids.
00:02:03.690 --> 00:02:05.270
Here’s what we can write about that.
00:02:05.780 --> 00:02:12.790
We can write that the average distance between particles and air is much greater than the average distance between particles in water.
00:02:13.210 --> 00:02:20.860
That greater average distance between particles in air means there are far fewer collisions per unit time and therefore the pressure is less.
00:02:21.340 --> 00:02:24.040
Let’s continue thinking about these two different fluids.
00:02:24.070 --> 00:02:31.600
And specifically, we’ll consider whether this average distance between particles might vary in a column of air or in a column of water.
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:34.370
Figure one shows two graphs.
00:02:34.570 --> 00:02:38.050
One graph shows air pressure change with height above sea level.
00:02:38.400 --> 00:02:42.370
The other graph shows total pressure change with depth below sea level.
00:02:42.880 --> 00:02:49.830
How does the average distance between particles in a volume of water vary with the total weight pushing down from above the particles?
00:02:50.450 --> 00:03:00.030
Looking at figure one, we see it consists of two graphs, each one showing us height above sea level on the vertical axis and pressure in kilopascals on the horizontal.
00:03:00.380 --> 00:03:05.530
That said as we look more closely, we see an important difference between the way these axes are labelled.
00:03:05.990 --> 00:03:12.180
Notice in the graph on the left that the height is measured in kilometers and all the values on the axis are positive.
00:03:12.580 --> 00:03:19.080
But on the other graph, our heights above sea level are measured in meters and the values we see are negative, less than zero.
00:03:19.540 --> 00:03:26.630
This tells us that our graph on the left describes the fluid which stays above sea level; that is, it describes the behavior of air.
00:03:27.100 --> 00:03:36.060
On the other hand, since our graph on the right shows negative height values relative to sea level, that means these are really depth values and that the chart refers to water.
00:03:36.520 --> 00:03:41.330
Since our question has to do with water, that means we’ll be focusing on this graph on the right.
00:03:41.790 --> 00:03:43.650
Here’s what this question is getting at.
00:03:43.940 --> 00:03:55.660
What it means is as we start out at sea level and go further and further down, does the average distance between the water in this water column that’s getting longer and longer change as we go farther down?
00:03:56.030 --> 00:04:04.410
For example, we might suspect that as we get farther and farther down the column, the increasing pressure crushes the water molecules closer together.
00:04:04.860 --> 00:04:07.000
That’s one possibility for what might happen.
00:04:07.230 --> 00:04:11.720
But to find out what really does happen, we’ll consult the curve shown on this graph.
00:04:12.240 --> 00:04:17.050
Looking at this curve, perhaps the first thing that stands out is that it seems to be a straight line.
00:04:17.240 --> 00:04:20.190
It seems that the slope of this line is constant throughout.
00:04:20.700 --> 00:04:25.990
Here’s what that tells us: imagine that we had a column of water that was five meters deep.
00:04:26.270 --> 00:04:30.190
So on our curve, that would be halfway between our minimum and maximum depths.
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:35.330
And imagine further that we were somehow able to measure the pressure at the very bottom of this column.
00:04:35.730 --> 00:04:39.720
And let’s say this pressure reading came back at a value we can call 𝑃 sub one.
00:04:40.140 --> 00:04:58.380
Going back to our curve, the fact that the slope of this curve is constant means that if we added another five-meter-tall stack of water and we were able to measure the pressure at the bottom of this now 10-meter-tall stack, that pressure we’re told by our graph would be equal to twice 𝑃 sub one.
00:04:58.870 --> 00:05:05.500
This tells us that the weight of our bottom five-meter-tall stack of water is the same as the weight of our top stack.
00:05:05.920 --> 00:05:10.670
In other words, the density of water stays constant throughout this 10-meter-tall column.
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:20.870
If we were to compare the average distance between water particles in the top of this column to the average distance between particles at the bottom, we would find they’re effectively the same.
00:05:21.240 --> 00:05:25.080
This happens because water is a nearly incompressible fluid.
00:05:25.340 --> 00:05:30.510
No matter how hard we press on it, the average distance between particles of water doesn’t change very much.
00:05:30.880 --> 00:05:33.250
Here is what we can say then as an answer to our question.
00:05:33.720 --> 00:05:43.190
We can say that the average distance between particles in a volume of water remains constant as the total weight pushing down from above the particles increases.
00:05:43.610 --> 00:05:47.300
That’s how water behaves as the water column gets taller and taller.
00:05:47.560 --> 00:05:49.060
Now, let’s see about air.
00:05:49.660 --> 00:05:57.160
The question is how does the average distance between particles in a volume of air vary with the total weight pushing down from above the particles.
00:05:57.640 --> 00:06:04.960
Since our focus is now on air in the graph on the left, we can clear away the graph on water to create some space for our discussion.
00:06:05.430 --> 00:06:10.260
Looking at this plot of air height versus pressure, something about it may seem confusing.
00:06:10.680 --> 00:06:23.380
If we look at the heights of 10 and 20 kilometers above sea level, we notice that the pressure that’s associated with a 20-kilometer altitude is less than the pressure associated with a 10-kilometer altitude.
00:06:23.650 --> 00:06:24.640
Why might that be?
00:06:25.190 --> 00:06:32.930
We can sketch out both sea level as well as 10 kilometers elevation, 20 kilometers, and 30 kilometers above sea level.
00:06:33.480 --> 00:06:41.550
On this sketch, let’s imagine that we’re at an altitude of 20 kilometers and that 30 kilometers is the top of an air column in this atmosphere.
00:06:42.010 --> 00:06:49.620
At this elevation of 20 kilometers, that means we have 10 kilometers of an air column above us pressing down on us at this altitude.
00:06:50.030 --> 00:06:59.910
On the other hand, if we’re at an altitude of 10 kilometers above sea level, then that means there’s a 20-kilometer-tall column of air pressing down on us at this altitude.
00:07:00.230 --> 00:07:06.650
This explains why the pressure on our graph at lower altitudes is higher than the pressure at higher altitudes.
00:07:06.900 --> 00:07:13.310
It’s because the column of air pressing down on us is increasingly tall as we get closer and closer to sea level.
00:07:14.230 --> 00:07:23.690
What we’re interested in understanding is does the average distance between particles of air in this air column vary as we move through the column up and down.
00:07:24.070 --> 00:07:31.640
To figure that out, we can refer to our graph and we’ll again use the attitudes of 10 and 20 kilometers above sea level, respectively.
00:07:32.100 --> 00:07:41.140
Say that we had a 10-kilometer-tall stack of air and just like we did with our water column, we will somehow get to the bottom of it and measure the pressure of that stack.
00:07:41.530 --> 00:07:46.350
We’ll say that the pressure due to this 10-kilometer-tall column of air is 𝑃 sub two.
00:07:46.800 --> 00:07:52.410
And then, just like we did for water, let’s add another stack of the same height on top of this one.
00:07:52.670 --> 00:07:56.600
And we’ll go to the bottom of the total combined height and again measure the pressure.
00:07:57.110 --> 00:08:02.530
What will we find to be the pressure reading at the bottom of this now 20-kilometer-tall column of air.
00:08:02.970 --> 00:08:10.090
Our answer based on the shape of our curve is that we’ll measure a pressure, which is greater than two times 𝑃 sub two.
00:08:10.530 --> 00:08:18.120
In other words, the weight of the bottom 10 kilometers of air in our column is greater than the weight of the top 10 kilometers of air.
00:08:18.370 --> 00:08:24.000
That tells us that the density of air from top to bottom in this column is not constant like it was for water.
00:08:24.410 --> 00:08:29.710
Rather the farther down in the column we go, the more closely packed the air particles are.
00:08:30.120 --> 00:08:34.250
This tells us then that air, unlike water, is a compressible fluid.
00:08:34.850 --> 00:08:40.530
And as regards the average distance between particles of air throughout this column, here’s what we can say.
00:08:41.060 --> 00:08:50.060
We can write that the average distance between particles in a volume of air decreases as the total weight pushing down from above the particles increases.
00:08:50.420 --> 00:08:55.580
We know this is true based on the way that the slope of the curve in our graph changes.
00:08:55.910 --> 00:09:05.390
Because the slope flattens out as we move from left to right, that means that doubling the height of our air column will more than double the pressure at the bottom of that column.
00:09:05.840 --> 00:09:09.870
Speaking of pressure, let’s consider an application of this concept next.
00:09:10.990 --> 00:09:17.650
Air particles exert a force of 2625 newtons on the surface of a high-altitude weather balloon.
00:09:18.110 --> 00:09:21.610
The balloon surface area is 750 square centimeters.
00:09:22.000 --> 00:09:29.430
Use these values and the data shown in figure one to show that the balloon is floating more than five kilometers above sea level.
00:09:30.160 --> 00:09:37.300
In figure one, we see the remaining plot which shows height above sea level in kilometers versus pressure in kilopascals.
00:09:37.700 --> 00:09:46.120
We want to apply the data we find in this plot to the scenario in order to show that the weather balloon is at least five kilometers above sea level.
00:09:46.560 --> 00:09:51.060
To start out, let’s consider our balloon, which we know is surrounded by air particles.
00:09:51.390 --> 00:09:57.040
These air particles as they collide with the balloon create a force acting inward on it.
00:09:57.450 --> 00:10:00.680
And this force is distributed over the balloon’s surface area.
00:10:01.130 --> 00:10:05.800
We can recall that a force spread over an area gives rise to pressure.
00:10:06.290 --> 00:10:13.940
In particular, pressure in units of pascals is equal to force in units of newtons divided by area in units of meter squared.
00:10:14.420 --> 00:10:22.580
As we look to calculate the pressure acting on this weather balloon, we’re given the force acting on it in units of newtons and we’re also given the area.
00:10:22.740 --> 00:10:25.800
But the area notice is given in units of square centimeters.
00:10:26.140 --> 00:10:31.340
Before we use that value in our calculation, we want to convert it into units of meters squared.
00:10:31.690 --> 00:10:32.950
Here’s how we can do that.
00:10:33.330 --> 00:10:36.550
We recall that 100 centimeters is equal to one meter.
00:10:36.980 --> 00:10:44.670
If we then square both sides of this equation, we find that 10000 square centimeters is equal to one meter squared.
00:10:44.920 --> 00:10:48.520
That’s the conversion ratio between square centimeters and square meters.
00:10:49.030 --> 00:10:50.770
So let’s use that ratio.
00:10:51.030 --> 00:10:58.120
We’ll take our given area of the weather balloon in square centimeters, 750, and we’ll multiply it by this conversion factor.
00:10:58.460 --> 00:11:03.770
Notice that as we do, the units of square centimeters cancel out and we’re left with units of square meters.
00:11:04.350 --> 00:11:07.890
We find a result of 0.075 square meters.
00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:11.410
That’s the area of the weather balloon in SI standard units.
00:11:11.910 --> 00:11:19.550
Now that we know the area of the balloon and the force acting on it in the units we want, we’re ready to plug in and solve for the pressure acting on the balloon.
00:11:20.090 --> 00:11:32.270
2625 newtons divided by 0.075 square meters is equal to 35000 pascals or — put in other way — 35 kilopascals.
00:11:32.850 --> 00:11:41.450
Now that we have the pressure acting on our balloon in units according to our graph, we can use our graph to approximate the altitude of the weather balloon.
00:11:41.970 --> 00:11:46.970
Remember that we want to show that the balloon is at at least five kilometers above sea level.
00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:51.340
If we find that elevation on our graph, it’s halfway between zero and 10.
00:11:51.910 --> 00:11:59.900
And if we find out the corresponding pressure to five kilometers of elevation, we see that it’s greater than 50 kilopascals.
00:12:00.340 --> 00:12:02.220
We don’t know exactly what that pressure is.
00:12:02.220 --> 00:12:04.330
But we can see it is greater than 50.
00:12:04.860 --> 00:12:10.730
Now, remember our calculation which found that the pressure acting on this weather balloon is 35 kilopascals.
00:12:11.140 --> 00:12:20.730
If we locate that value on the horizontal axis of our plot, we don’t know exactly where will it lie, but we do know that it’s less than 50; it’s to the left of 50.
00:12:21.320 --> 00:12:30.270
If we then look for the corresponding height above sea level for this pressure, we see that it’s in the neighborhood of 10 kilometers, again not an exact value.
00:12:30.270 --> 00:12:31.950
But here is what we do know for certain.
00:12:32.350 --> 00:12:47.380
Because an elevation above sea level of five kilometers corresponds to a pressure of greater than 50 kilopascals and since the pressure we found acting on our weather balloon is less than 50 kilopascals, then based on the shape of our curve.
00:12:47.450 --> 00:12:52.260
That means the elevation of our weather balloon must be greater than five kilometers from sea level.
00:12:52.630 --> 00:12:55.610
With that then, we’ve demonstrated what we wanted to show.
00:12:56.400 --> 00:13:00.590
Finally, let’s consider an example where we’re below sea level, under water.
00:13:01.720 --> 00:13:10.150
Figure two shows a submarine’s flotation chamber, which can be filled with seawater through an outlet and with air through the cap of a compressed air tank.
00:13:10.570 --> 00:13:15.180
The area of the outlet is much larger than the area of the compressed air tank’s cap.
00:13:15.660 --> 00:13:19.760
The pressure due to the compressed air and the external seawater is the same.
00:13:20.180 --> 00:13:24.690
How does the force of the compressed air compared to the force of the external seawater?
00:13:25.220 --> 00:13:30.950
Looking at figure two, we see a diagram of a floatation chamber, which is standard in submarines.
00:13:31.200 --> 00:13:40.610
We see that it’s possible for air from a compressed air tank to enter the floatation chamber and it’s also possible for seawater from the outside to enter the chamber through the outlet.
00:13:40.970 --> 00:13:50.150
The ratio of air and water in the flotation chamber is varied, depending on whether the submarine wants to ascend, descend, or keep at the same depth.
00:13:50.840 --> 00:14:00.010
We’re told in the problem statement that the area of the outlet — the area shown here — is much larger than the area of the compressed air tank’s cap, shown here.
00:14:00.500 --> 00:14:09.950
However, we’re also told that the overall pressure exerted by the seawater to get into the floatation chamber and the overall pressure exerted by the compressed air is the same.
00:14:10.350 --> 00:14:16.080
Knowing all that, we want to compare the force of the compressed air to the force of the external seawater.
00:14:16.380 --> 00:14:21.170
We can do this by making use of the relationship between pressure, force, and area.
00:14:21.710 --> 00:14:26.590
Recall that pressure, 𝑃, is equal to a force spread over some area, 𝐴.
00:14:27.010 --> 00:14:34.680
In our situation, we have two pressures: the pressure of the seawater — we’ll call 𝑃 sub 𝑤 — and the pressure of the air — we’ll call 𝑃 sub 𝑎.
00:14:35.030 --> 00:14:38.810
And furthermore, we’re told that these two pressures are equal to one another.
00:14:39.250 --> 00:14:44.520
We can build off this fact by using our expression for pressure; that it’s a force over an area.
00:14:44.900 --> 00:14:59.960
We can say that the force of the seawater on the outlet divided by the area that the water has to get through — that is the area of the outlet — is equal to the force of the compressed air acting on its cap divided by the area of that cap — we’ll call it 𝐴 sub 𝑎.
00:15:00.460 --> 00:15:09.920
We remember now that we’re also told something about 𝐴 sub 𝑤 and 𝐴 sub 𝑎 — the area that the water and the area that the air have to get into the floatation chamber, respectively.
00:15:10.290 --> 00:15:16.540
In particular, we’re told that the area that the water has to get into the chamber is much bigger than the area that the air has.
00:15:16.830 --> 00:15:20.700
The area of the outlet is bigger than the area of the compressed air tank cap.
00:15:21.100 --> 00:15:27.530
We can use this fact to help us understand how the two forces 𝐹 sub 𝑤 and 𝐹 sub 𝑎 relate to one another.
00:15:27.870 --> 00:15:34.600
To do that, let’s cross multiply so that our areas are on the right side of this equation and our forces are on the left.
00:15:35.030 --> 00:15:43.480
Our equation now tells us that the force of the water to the force of the air is equal to the area the water has to enter the chamber to the area the air has.
00:15:43.850 --> 00:15:50.070
And since 𝐴 sub 𝑤 is greater than 𝐴 sub 𝑎, that means this fraction must be greater than one.
00:15:50.570 --> 00:15:58.890
Not only that, since the fraction is also equal to 𝐹 sub 𝑤 over 𝐹 sub 𝑎, that means that this ratio must also be greater than one.
00:15:59.360 --> 00:16:09.040
If we multiplied both sides of this inequality by 𝐹 sub 𝑎, the force of the air on a cap, what we find is that 𝐹 sub 𝑤 is greater than 𝐹 sub 𝑎.
00:16:09.470 --> 00:16:16.460
This means that the force of the seawater pushing on the outlet is greater than the force of the compressed air pushing on the tank cap.